Sites sur "Significant Others"

magnificent?significant???? - ???? : magnificent?significant??????????????magnificent??adj.???;???;???????;????????She is magnificent at making you feel you can talk quite naturally to her.?????
?NS????Not Significant?????????????????? : ???NS????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????"The 1-pixel discrepancy between this and our earlier result is not significant" ???????????????????????
important,essential,vital???????? - ?? : important????? significant??????important? essential??????? necessary crucial???????essential?????????????????????essential?????????? cardinal???????????????????????or???????????? vital????????? ...
???????????????LSD?tukey??????????? - ?? : ?1?LSD??Least Significant Difference?? ????????????????????????????t?????????? ???????????????LSD????????? ??????????????????????????? ?2?Scheffe??
????????????????????? - ?? : ???? ?????????????0?????????????????????????????0.032????????0.0320????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????0.32586???????????????5?????0.33 ...
???p<0.05,p<0.01,p<0.001_????? - ???? : ??????p??????????????????????????????????p???????????????0.05?0.01?0.001??????????????????????????p??????????????????????1.p<0.05??????????????????? ...
????,???significant ?decimal ?????????????.. : ???? significant digit?? ????????? ??????????????? 3.45?3?significant digit 3.456?4? 3.4560?5? 103.4560?6? 345600?4? 0.0000003456?4? decimal place????????...
???????????????? - ?? : ???Thank you for your significant reminding. According to your suggestion, we corrected the above grammatical errors and made an effort to correct the spelling and grammar errors and polish the whole manuscript. We would like to confirm that the suitably revised manuscript is understandable to readers.
???p<0.05 ??>0.05 ???????????? ??_???? : ??P>0.05 ??? ??????0.01 meaningful,significant ????????????_???? : a significant change in tax laws a significant change in the Constitution a significant contribution significant details statistically significant too closely correlated to be attributed to chance and therefore indicating a systematic relation [?] the interaction effect is significant at the .01 level no significant difference was ...